1. Industry & Trade

Discuss in my forum

Barbara Farfan

Super Bowl XLV Retail Scores – The Biggest Retail Advertising Bet Payoff, Non-Attendance As a Strategy, Car Commercials Blur, New Media Marketing Struggles and Results in #SB45 (TM, HMC, GM, SKX, BBY, JACK)

By , About.com GuideFebruary 7, 2011

Follow me on:

2012 Update for Super Bowl XLVI and Retail Advertising Commercials:

Scores for the sports part of Super Bowl XLV are easily interpreted, but for the advertising part of the 2011 Super Bowl event the winners are not as clear. If the U.S. retail industry measures Super Bowl XLV by its biggest advertising bet payoff, its non-attendance strategies, and its new media marketing activities, then the first major event on the 2011 retail sales calendar was a success. If you're looking for retail Super Bowl success in the blur of car commercials or in some tangible post-Super Bowl sales results, the scores for the retail industry might not be as easy to calculate.

>> See all the retail Super Bowl XLV commercials >>

Papa John's placed the biggest Super Bowl bet in retail industry history and got an equally big payoff when Super Bowl XLV was played and won without any overtime. If Super Bowl XLV had gone into overtime, the Papa of pizza chains would have owed every registered member of its customer loyalty club a free pizza. Since that didn't happen, Papa John's is walking away from Super Bowl XLV with untold numbers of newly registered loyalty program participants, that it didn't cost them very much dough to acquire.

Populating the Papa Points program just with the promise of a potential premium is a perfect promotion. (Say that three times fast.) Unlike when Denny's generously invited every man, woman, and child in America to a free breakfast during the Recession Bowl of 2009, Papa John's won good will points just by demonstrating the willingness to give give away a large amount of free food, but not actually having to do it. Brilliant!

If Papa John's had lost its overtime pizza payout bet, the supernova of media mentions associated with that historic event would have yielded the 3rd largest U.S. pizza delivery chain the world's best post-game publicity for a Super Bowl non-advertiser. I predict that Papa John's has now created the model for winning big by NOT advertising in a Super Bowl.

>> Take the Super Bowl Super Commercial Super Trivia Quiz >>

Traditional TV Super Bowl commercials are so yesterday anyway. Many were referring to this year's Super Bowl as the Transmedia Bowl because of the way the Super Bowl advertisers integrated their traditional media buys with new media and social media strategies. I think those Transmedia Bowl pundits weren't paying much attention last year when the biggest spotlights of Super Bowl XLIV were shining on Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube before, during, and after the game.

This year, Audi was bragging about its use of Twitter to engage people with its Super Bowl advertising. Tweeters who used the hashtag label "#Progressis" following the airing of the Audi 60-second Super Bowl commercial became eligible to win a test-drive of an Audi R8.

From my front row seat couch-side Super Bowl seat, I see two big challenges with this Audi promotion. First, tweeters think "your" and "you're" are both spelled "ur," and yet they are expected to be able to spell "Progressis?" Challenge #2 - The prize of this Audi promotion is a test drive? Seriously? Audi can hand over $6 million for a one-minute commercial, but they can't hand over car keys to the grand prize winner for more than an hour?

If you're going to make Tweeters spell big words, I think you at least need to give them something they can take home as a souvenir in return for their effort. That just seems fair.

Another questionable Super Bowl promotion prize from the retail industry was the win-a-workout with Kim Kardashian giveaway. Admittedly, I do not understand the widespread fascination with the Kardiashians, but it seems like crazed Kardashian fans are tabloid people, not shape-up people. So, while I'm sure there was an impressive number of gossip-loving starmongers who were willing to post a Kim Kardashian video on their Facebook wall after her heavily hyped commercial aired during the Super Bowl, I question whether this will actually translate to sales of $100 shape-up shoes, even if they do have pink shoe laces.

Super Bowl Marketing Activity vs. Super Bowl Marketing Accomplishment

While the Green Bay Vs. Pittsburgh battle was being played on the field, the marketing activity vs. marketing accomplishment battle was being played on every digital broadcast channel available to Super Bowl advertisers. While it's nice for companies to be able to connect with their customers in an infinite number of ways, if all the socializing doesn't eventually connect these companies to customer credit card transactions, then it's much a-post about nothing.

Perhaps uncertainty about how to translate multi-million dollar multimedia Super Bowl advertising into hard retail sales is the reason why so many retail companies sat on the Superbowl advertising sidelines this year. If not for the aggressive participation of automobile advertisers, the U.S. retail industry would only have been represented by Teleflora, Skechers (SKX), and Best Buy (BBY), which is not exactly an impressive retail trio.

The most aggressive of the automobile retailers in the Super Bowl XLV lineup was General Motors (GM). In the past two years, presumably GM's leaders decided that making hideously extravagant Super Bowl media buys would be in bad taste while the company was actively going into and getting out of the largest bankruptcy in U.S. business history. So, "Super Bowl" was not a line item on the GM budget in 2009 or 2010.

Apparently $15 million for 2 1/2 minutes of attention was not in bad taste in 2011, though, in somebody's opinion. "Somebody" is probably not the taxpayers who can't find a full-time job or pay their mortgage while their tax dollars are still supporting GM's daily operations. GM didn't ask those somebodies for their opinion about GM's Super Bowl advertising budget on the GM Facebook wall before making the big advertising buy.

(Side note to the retail industry.... you do realize that when you bribe people to "like" you, it doesn't necessarily mean that they like you, right?)

As for the GM commercials themselves... Did anybody else find it odd that one commercial featured seniors who are too old to drive and another commercial featured a car dealership from several decades ago? GM's Super Bowl XLV commercials seem to demonstrate that GM still has a fundamental misunderstanding about who their customer base is and what that customer base wants. Just because you get bailed out of a mess, doesn't mean that the choices that created the mess in the first place automatically disappear too. I'm just saying.

While nine auto companies fought for the attention of the Super Bowl audience, two of the "Forbes Best Car Brands" chose not to play the Super Bowl advertising game at all in 2011 - Toyota (TM), and Lexus (Honda (HMC) and Volvo did some regional advertising.) The biggest consequences may be to Lexus, whose recent sales took a double-digit drop, while rival Super Bowl advertisers BMW and Mercedes-Benz have been riding on a double-digit rise. With its Super Bowl absence, Lexus may lose some of its cool points to the Germans, along with its 11-year luxury car sales leader crown.

Toyota may be the car company that got it right by saving its money for another advertising promotion another day. After about the tenth Super Bowl car commercial, they all started to blur together for me. I can only imagine that was the same for intoxicated viewers as well. The car makes, models, and even brands got lost in a sea of special effects and strange historic references. Special effects and historic references were used by an odd number of Super Bowl XLV commercials, by the way, which made it even more difficult to distinguish one car ad from another. What did you think of the Super Bowl XLV car commercials? Vote in the poll at the right and see the results instantly >> The most notable absence in the Super Bowl commercial lineup was the U.S. retail restaurant industry. There was not a burger, taco, wing, nugget, slice, or McAnything advertised by American food retailers in the Super Bowl ad lineup. This Super Bowl shun from restaurant chains may have less to do with the price of the advertising spots and more to do with the performance of the restaurant industry as a whole. After three consecutive years of negative real sales growth for the U.S. restaurant industry, Super Bowl ads at any price would not have been practical for many major restaurant chains. It's hard to feel too badly for the U.S. restaurant industry, though, since its annual sales are larger than the economies of 90% of the countries in the world. Greece didn't buy a Super Bowl ad this year either. They are coming off a few bad years of negative economic growth as well. Jack in the Box (JACK) used the Super Bowl as an excuse to introduce its "All-American Jack," and employed marketing strategies which did not include a $100,000 per second Super Bowl television commercial to hype the "All American." We'll know soon enough if the Jack in the Box Super Bowl non-advertising strategies paid off by the increase in the average waist size of Americans in 2011. The "All-American Jack" is a healthy combination of two extra large burgers smothered in two kinds of cheese. If you "make it a meal," with fries and a drink, you can get an entire day's worth of caloric intake and a week's worth of sodium and fat for just $4.99. That's a whole lotta of bad for the buck. Apparently "All-American" is the new code word for "obese" in the Jack in the Box boardroom. Actually the rest of the world has been using those two terms interchangeably for a few years. The rest of the world, by the way, was keeping an eye on the Super Bowl as well. One billion is the quoted (but not attributed) global audience figure that is being repeatedly reported in the media. And other aspects of Super Bowl XLV are being measured in the billions as well:
  • $10 billion is the amount of Super Bowl related consumer spending that was predicted by the National Retail Federation (NRF)
  •  
  • 1.25 billion chicken wing portions were expected to be consumed, according to the National Chicken Council.
  • Super Bowl wagers worldwide were estimated to be between $1 billion and $10 billion.
  • 70 billion is the estimated number of calories consumed by Super Bowl chip eaters.
  • BMW invested $1 billion in the U.S. in order to make the "built in America" cars that it advertised during Super Bowl XLV.
According to these numbers, Super Bowl Sunday 2011 was a success for U.S. retailers, odds-on gamblers, Biggest Loser producers, and South Carolina autoworkers. It was. however, a bad day for chickens. Trending Retail Topics | Weekly Retail Newsletter | Follow on Twitter | "Like" on Facebook


Comments

No comments yet. Leave a Comment

Leave a Comment


Line and paragraph breaks are automatic. Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title="">, <b>, <i>, <strike>

©2012 About.com. All rights reserved.

A part of The New York Times Company.